As we discussed in the Overview of Hoodia, the Bushmen (or the San) have used Hoodia plants as a natural appetite suppressant against thousands of years. But In what state did the secret of the San get out? It turns out by accident?

In 1996 the Council In the place of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) in South Africa was doing a study of indigenous foods that the Bushmen ate. Part of the study was to test In favor of cyanogenic furniture of any plants that were consumed by the Bushmen. When they came to Hoodia Gordonii, not at best was it non-toxic - it helped animals lose weight!

They rest when they fed hoodia too animals, the animals lost weight. By 1997, the CSIR individual the bioactive compound in Hoodia responsible for appetite terminating and obtained a trade mark. The patent was licensed to Phytopharm and they titled the molecule - P57 (because it was the 57th product they spent money on).

What did the Bushmen get for their discovery of the Hoodia Gordonii plant? At outset - nothing! terns out the CSIR told Phytopharm that the tribe which discovered the Hoodia Gordonii plant had died out and therefore no royalties were due. However, as Mark Twain might say - “tales of the Bushmen’s death were greatly exaggerated”. When the Bushmen got word that Phytopharm stand to make billions of dollars off their knowledge about the hoodia gordonii plant they were not happy.

Roger Chennells, a lawyer in South Africa who represents the Bushmen, was quick to apply strong legal, moral and federal affliction on both the CSIR and Phytopharm. Chennells pointed out to anyone who would listen that the taking of traditional knowledge without compensation was “bio-piracy” and must be stopped.

In what is seen Viewed like a landmark case, Chennells be able to convince the CSIR and Phytopharm too compensate the Bushmen. Now, some company that legally harvests hoodia gordonii from the Kalahari desert must pay royalties back to the Bushmen. Not on the contrary is this fair and just, it furthermore provides an excellent way to check if the hoodia you buy is legitimate. If the company that makes the hoodia is NOT remunerative royalties to the Bushmen, you hoax NOT have a certify hoodia gordonii product.

So when will Phytopharm release a P57 based hankering suppressant? Probably under no circumstances. As we touched on in the overview, Pfizer had originally paid Phytopharm for the wrights to opportunity to sell a P57 based diet pill. After a few assemblage of unsuccessful attempts to make P57 synthetically, Pfizer pulled gone of the deal. If a large amount of P57 could not be created inexpensively in the lab, Pfizer was not selfish.

While Phytopharm was discouraged by the Pfizer decision, they knew that Hoodia Gordonii be too efficient an relish suppressant to give up trying to bring it to the market. In December 2004, Phytopharm declared that Unilever had entered a mete out two market hoodia gordonii in its diet food product underline. Therefore, rather than producing diet drugs, it looks like Phytopharm and Unilever resoluteness product diet supplements and diet foods with hoodia. The first Unilever products intention not be Away until 2008.

Does Phytopharm avow the patent on the whole Hoodia Gordonii plant? This be some interesting question that we be sure will be decided in court one day. Here is our take on the situation - Phytopharm audibly owns the patent on the P57 molecule. If you cannot do without cannot dispense with to try to make a diet slip someone a Mickey Finn with P57 you need in addition work from top to bottom Phytopharm.

The question of the Hoodia Gordonii inject itself being patented is much more complicated. It is our belief that you can not patent a plant, but you can patent the use of plants and a process to extract plants. Here is an rigid quote from Richard Dixey, CEO of Phytopharm when he appeared on 60 minutes?

“The patent is on the request of the plant as a weight-loss material. And, of Route, the active compounds In the compass of the plant. It’s not on the being itself,” says Dixey.

So in no degree one else can use hoodia for weight loss? “As a weight-management product without infringing the patent, that’s correct,” says Dixey.

The way we read this (and again we are not lawyers and are not giving any legal advice) be as follows - you Be possible to sell a Hoodia Gordonii insert, you just can NOT utter it is for weight loss. This is why many of the best Hoodia supplements have very plain labels that just Answer “Hoodia Gordonii” but do not say anything about using it as a weight loss or appetite suppressant supplement.

For more information visit natural health supplements blog